Texas Tribune
Texas House Republican matchups take center stage of primary
by Patrick Svitek, The Texas Tribune – 2023-12-12 15:42:08
SUMMARY: The Texas primary is set for March, with Donald Trump and Joe Biden leading their parties' presidential nominations, focusing the action on down-ballot races. Governor Greg Abbott and Attorney General Ken Paxton seek revenge against GOP House members, with at least 57% of House Republicans facing primary challenges. A record number of GOP candidates filed, with Paxton and Abbott endorsing various primary challengers. Democrats have at least 10 candidates for the U.S. Senate primary, led by Colin Allred in fundraising. Competitive races are expected in Dallas and Houston, with significant turnover among Democrats including a rare incumbent faceoff and multiple open seats.
—————-
FULL ARTICLE:
Sign up for The Brief, The Texas Tribune's daily newsletter that keeps readers up to speed on the most essential Texas news.
The field is set for the Texas primary — making way for a dramatic few months ahead of the March election.
At the top of the ticket, Texans will vote on who they want as their party's presidential nominee — where Donald Trump has a landslide lead for Republicans and President Joe Biden has no serious competition among Democrats.
That means the most interesting action in Texas will be down-ballot.
With both Gov. Greg Abbott and Attorney General Ken Paxton out for revenge, Republican members of the Texas House are the top target on the ballot. But Democrats are also facing ample drama as political dominoes fall in Dallas and Houston, creating new opportunities for ambitious members of the party.
The candidate filing deadline for the March primary was 6 p.m. Monday. .
Republicans
On the GOP side, much of the primary drama is being driven by Abbott and Paxton.
Paxton is working to unseat the dozens of House Republicans who voted to impeach him in May, while Abbott wants to defeat a smaller group of House Republicans who thwarted his yearlong push for school vouchers. That has created a rare dynamic where two of the most powerful Republicans in the state are backing primary challengers to House Republicans, sometimes aligning behind the same challenger and sometimes not.
It has led to a marked increase in primary challengers. After 43% of House Republicans faced opposition in 2022, at least 57% have primary challengers this time.
The Texas GOP said Tuesday it had “a record-breaking 387 candidates file in Austin, plus many more in their local county offices, marking the second-highest candidate turnout in the history of the” party.
The attorney general has endorsed nearly two dozen primary challengers to state House Republicans who voted to impeach him. Those candidates, like Paxton, have positioned themselves as further right than House leadership and could prove to be antagonistic toward Speaker Dade Phelan — should he win his own primary. The Texas Senate acquitted Paxton after a trial in September.
Paxton's endorsees include Republicans like Mitch Little, a Frisco lawyer who represented Paxton at the trial and is running against Rep. Kronda Thimesch, R-Lewisville. Paxton also backed Wes Virdell, a primary challenger to Rep. Andrew Murr — the Junction Republican who chaired the House board of impeachment managers — before Murr announced his retirement last month.
Abbott is targeting a narrower group of 16 House Republicans who are seeking reelection and voted last month to strip a voucher program out of a broad education bill. Abbott has endorsed six primary challengers to those members so far.
Vouchers, which would have allowed public dollars to fund private school education, were Abbott's top legislative priority. He campaigned for reelection on the promise of passing vouchers, and threatened throughout the year to target Republican lawmakers who stood in his way.
Making good on that threat, Abbott has gotten behind challengers like Hillary Hickland, an activist mother from Belton who has taken her kids out of public schools in recent years. She is running against Rep. Hugh Shine, R-Temple.
Other notable primary challengers have emerged in recent days. Shelley Luther, the Dallas salon owner who became famous to conservatives for defying COVID-19 shutdown orders, filed for a rematch against Rep. Reggie Smith, R-Sherman. And Katrina Pierson, the North Texas activist best known as a spokesperson for Trump's 2016 campaign, joined the primary against Rep. Justin Holland, R-Rockwall.
The aggressive involvement of Abbott and Paxton means Phelan will have his hands full defending his GOP members. And Phelan has a primary of his own after running uncontested in 2022. This time he faces two challengers, led by David Covey, the former chair of the Orange County GOP.
Abbott and Paxton are also playing in open seats where they believe they can replace retiring House Republicans with a better political ally. One example is House District 14, where anti-voucher Rep. John Raney, R-College Station, is not seeking reelection and Abbott has endorsed Bryan businessman Paul Dyson for the seat. Abbott said in his endorsement that he trusts Dyson to “expand school choice for all Texas families once and for all.”
In House District 87, Abbott and Paxton have aligned behind Caroline Fairly, the daughter of an Amarillo businessman, Alex Fairly, who Texas conservatives are working to cultivate as a new megadonor. Fairly is among four Republicans running to replace retiring Rep. Four Price, R-Amarillo, who opposes school vouchers.
In the Texas Senate, Republicans are looking at only one competitive primary, to replace retiring Sen. Drew Springer, R-Muenster. Four Republicans have filed for that seat, though one of them, Denton County GOP Chairman Brent Hagenbuch, is the frontrunner after getting endorsed by Lt. Gov. Dan Patrick, the very powerful presiding officer of the Senate.
As for congressional primaries, the GOP focus is largely on two open seats — the 12th District, where U.S. Rep. Kay Granger, R-Fort Worth, is retiring, and the 26th District, where U.S. Rep. Michael Burgess, R-Lewsiville, is not seeking reelection. Each primary has drawn a crush of candidates, though state Rep. Craig Goldman, R-Fort Worth, has piled up almost all the notable endorsements for Granger's seat and conservative media executive Brandon Gill recently got the backing of former President Donald Trump for Burgess' seat.
The closest thing to a competitive primary involving a congressional incumbent is probably in the 23rd Congressional District. U.S. Rep. Tony Gonzales, R-San Antonio, is facing four primary challengers after splitting with his party on issues like guns and the border.
Democrats
At the top of the ticket, Democrats have a primary for U.S. Senate that has drawn at least 10 candidates. U.S. Rep. Colin Allred, D-Dallas, has crushed the pack in fundraising, and his competitors include state Sen. Roland Gutierrez, D-San Antonio; state Rep. Carl Sherman, D-DeSoto; and Mark Gonzalez, former district attorney for Nueces County.
But Democrats' most spirited fights could be farther down the ballot, especially in Dallas and Houston.
Democrats saw a major late development Monday, when state Rep. Victoria Neave launched a primary challenge to state Sen. Nathan Johnson, an uncommon faceoff between two Dallas Democrats.
At least nine Democrats filed to succeed Allred in the 32nd Congressional District, a group that includes state Rep. Julie Johnson, D-Carrollton; Brian Williams, a prominent Dallas trauma surgeon; and Callie Butcher, whose campaign says she is the first transgender Texan to run for Congress in a major-party primary in Texas.
In Houston, at least six Democrats have filed for Whitmire's seat in Senate District 15, which has not been open since 1982. The field includes state Rep. Jarvis Johnson, D-Houston; Molly Cook, Whitmire's 2022 primary challenger; Karthik Soora, a Houston renewable energy developer; Todd Litton, the 2018 Democratic nominee for a nearby congressional seat; Michelle Anderson Bonton, executive director of the Anderson Center for the Arts; and Alberto “Beto” Cardenas Jr., a prominent Houston attorney who filed at the last minute Monday.
Whitmire defeated U.S. Rep. Sheila Jackson Lee in the mayoral runoff, and she quickly decided to seek reelection afterward. But she will face a primary challenge from at least one fellow Democrat, former Houston City Council member Amanda Edwards.
In both Houston and Dallas, the big open-seat primaries have triggered other vacancies, providing for significant turnover among Democrats in the state's two biggest metropolitan areas. Julie Johnson's run for Congress left her state House seat open, Jarvis Johnson's campaign for state Senate created a vacancy in his state House seat — and Neave's late primary challenge to Johnson left her state House seat open.
In other late developments, a Democratic member of the State Board of Education, Melissa Ortega, announced Monday morning she would not seek reelection. That left Democrats without a candidate for the seat with hours left until the filing deadline — a Republican had already filed — though it had become clear by Tuesday afternoon that at least one Democrat had managed to file at the last minute.
The post Texas House Republican matchups take center stage of primary appeared first on TexasTribune.org.
The Texas Tribune is a nonprofit, nonpartisan media organization that informs Texans — and engages with them — about public policy, politics, government and statewide issues.
Texas Tribune
Two political advisers plead guilty in Cuellar bribery case
by By Jasper Scherer, The Texas Tribune – 2024-05-09 12:33:09
SUMMARY: Two political consultants are set to plead guilty to laundering over $200,000 in bribes with U.S. Rep. Henry Cuellar. Court documents reveal their agreement to assist the Justice Department's case against Cuellar, who, along with his wife Imelda, was indicted for accepting nearly $600,000 from Azerbaijan and a Mexican bank. Cuellar supposedly influenced U.S. Treasury policies to benefit the bank. The consultants, who may face 20 years in prison and heavy fines, were reportedly involved in a project that was a front for channeling money to Cuellar, bypassing financial disclosures. Cuellar maintains his innocence.
—————-
FULL ARTICLE:
Sign up for The Brief, The Texas Tribune's daily newsletter that keeps readers up to speed on the most essential Texas news.
Two political consultants agreed to plead guilty to charges that they conspired with U.S. Rep. Henry Cuellar to launder more than $200,000 in bribes from a Mexican bank, according to recently unsealed court documents that show the consultants are cooperating with the Justice Department in its case against the Laredo Democrat.
Cuellar, a powerful South Texas Democrat, was indicted with his wife Imelda on charges of accepting almost $600,000 in bribes from Azerbaijan and a Mexican bank. The indictment, unsealed last week, accuses Cuellar of taking money from the commercial bank in exchange for influencing the Treasury Department to work around an anti-money laundering policy that threatened the bank's interests. Cuellar allegedly recruited his former campaign manager, Colin Strother, and another consultant, Florencio “Lencho” Rendon, to facilitate the payments, according to court records.
Rendon and Strother both struck plea deals with the Justice Department in March, in which they agreed to cooperate in the agency's investigation of the Cuellars. They each face up to 20 years in prison and six-figure fines for charges of conspiracy to commit money laundering.
The plea deals, which were first reported by the San Antonio Express-News, allege that Cuellar first asked Strother to meet with Rendon in February 2016 to “participate in a project to test and certify a fuel additive made by a Mexican company … so that it could be sold in the United States.” Rendon told Strother he would pay him $11,000 a month for the project, $10,000 of which Strother would pass on to Imelda Cuellar, according to the plea agreements.
Rendon paid Strother a total of $242,000 from March 2016 to December 2017, nearly $215,000 of which Strother then paid to Imelda Cuellar, the documents allege. Strother concluded the project was “a sham,” according to his plea deal, because neither Rendon nor Imelda Cuellar “did any legitimate work.” Strother “understood that the true purpose of the payments” was to “funnel money” to Henry Cuellar without the Laredo Democrat having to reveal it in his annual financial disclosures.
Cuellar has asserted his innocence, releasing a statement Friday in which he said his actions were “consistent with the actions of many of my colleagues and in the interest of the American people.”
This story is being updated.
We've got big things in store for you at The Texas Tribune Festival, happening Sept. 5–7 in downtown Austin. Join us for three days of big, bold conversations about politics, public policy and the day's news.
The post Two political advisers plead guilty in Cuellar bribery case appeared first on TexasTribune.org.
The Texas Tribune is a nonprofit, nonpartisan media organization that informs Texans — and engages with them — about public policy, politics, government and statewide issues.
Texas Tribune
Texas to pay landowners for damage caused by border crime
by By Alejandro Serrano, The Texas Tribune – 2024-05-09 12:05:39
SUMMARY: Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton announced a new program providing compensation for U.S.-Mexico border landowners for damage by migrants and smugglers. The program, established under Senate Bill 1133, offers reimbursements up to $75,000 and requires a police report of the incident. Landowners have 90 days to file a claim for events between September 1 and May 6. The state has allocated $18 million for this year and next. Paxton criticizes President Biden's policies for the influx of migrants causing property damage, and the application process is available online.
—————-
FULL ARTICLE:
Sign up for The Brief, The Texas Tribune's daily newsletter that keeps readers up to speed on the most essential Texas news.
Attorney General Ken Paxton on Thursday opened a program that will reimburse landowners along the U.S.-Mexico border for damage to their land and property caused by migrants, smugglers and drug traffickers.
Landowners have 90 days after an incident to file a claim, which requires a written police report documenting the damage. The state will compensate up to $75,000 for damage to things like a barn or a fence, Paxton's office said in a written statement that blamed President Joe Biden's administration for the problem.
“This program will provide needed relief to Texans whose property is damaged by foreign aliens waved into the country by the federal government,” Paxton said in the statement. “I am glad to help the farmers and ranchers on our borderlands who bear the costs of Biden's destructive policies.”
Property damage caused by migrants crossing through private property — such as cutting through fences as they make their way north — has been a constant problem for border-area landowners for decades. Private property is sometimes damaged when human smugglers try to evade authorities and crash their vehicles into fences or structures.
Landowners can apply online and should expect correspondence via email, according to the attorney general's office.
The Legislature last year approved a law, Senate Bill 1133, to create the program, which appropriated $18 million in state money for the fund for this year and next year.
Land damage before Sept. 1, when SB 1133 went into effect, is not eligible for the program. Landowners have 90 days to file claims for any damage to their land between Sept. 1 and May 6.
We've got big things in store for you at The Texas Tribune Festival, happening Sept. 5–7 in downtown Austin. Join us for three days of big, bold conversations about politics, public policy and the day's news.
The post Texas to pay landowners for damage caused by border crime appeared first on TexasTribune.org.
The Texas Tribune is a nonprofit, nonpartisan media organization that informs Texans — and engages with them — about public policy, politics, government and statewide issues.
Texas Tribune
TCEQ to vote on Lake Ringgold reservoir near Wichita Falls
by By Alejandra Martinez, The Texas Tribune – 2024-05-09 05:00:00
SUMMARY: The Texas Tribune reports on Wichita Falls' controversial plan to build a 16,000-acre reservoir, Lake Ringgold, to address water scarcity during droughts, exacerbated by climate change. Ranchers in Clay County oppose the lake, fearing it would inundate their properties and disrupt cattle grazing, including land held since the 1880s and locations with deep sentimental and family heritage value. Wichita Falls' Public Works Director, Russell Schreiber, argues that the reservoir would provide essential water storage. Despite a decrease in the city's population and a judge's recommendation to deny the permit due to the lake's excessive scale for the actual need, if approved, eminent domain may be used to obtain necessary land for the project, provoking significant local resistance. The Texas Commission on Environmental Quality is set to vote on the permit.
—————-
FULL ARTICLE:
Sign up for The Brief, The Texas Tribune's daily newsletter that keeps readers up to speed on the most essential Texas news.
HENRIETTA — One rancher said the proposed reservoir would cut through her property and flood areas of her ranch she needs to graze cattle. Another said it would flood ancestral lands that have been in his family since the 1880s. Another said his kid's childhood home, where many family memories were made, would be underwater.
They traveled to Austin last year to voice their opposition to a 16,000-acre reservoir that the city of Wichita Falls wants to build in Clay County, approximately 30 miles east of the city. City leaders have applied for a state permit, arguing that building Lake Ringgold is vital to help the city avoid running out of water during droughts, which climate change has made more common and more intense.
The Texas Commission on Environmental Quality, the state's environmental agency, will vote on the city's permit on Friday. If the city is granted the state water rights permit from TCEQ, it would next need to apply for a permit with the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers; the city needs both a state permit and a federal permit for the project.
The seeds for the Lake Ringgold plan began about three years after Russell Schreiber took a job as the director of public works for Wichita Falls in 2008. A severe drought struck the area in 2010 and lingered for years, nearly draining the city's two reservoirs: Lake Kickapoo and Lake Arrowhead. Schreiber faced the nearly impossible task of finding water during one of the worst droughts to ever hit North Texas.
“It was very devastating,” Schreiber said, remembering how Lake Arrowhead, the city's primary water reservoir, and its other reservoirs came close to drying up.
When Wichita Falls hit a Stage 5 drought, the highest of the stages that's considered a “drought catastrophe,” the city issued water restrictions banning all nonessential water use like refilling swimming pools, using sprinkler systems and washing cars.
From July 2014 to July 2015, the city tried something new: direct potable reuse, a water recycling process that purifies waste and sewer water using a filtration system. The system allows the filtered water to be immediately used as drinking water.
Schreiber said at the time the city exhausted nearly every option to reduce water use, and managed to reduce the demand on the two reservoirs by 75%. But it wasn't enough, and the reservoirs reached an all-time low of 20% of capacity.
This prompted city officials to dust off plans for a new reservoir that's been considered since the 1950s.
“We're the only water supply for the whole North Texas region,” Schreiber said, referring to nearby communities like Olney, Burkburnett, Electra and a dozen others that get water from the same reservoirs. “And it's our job to ensure that there's adequate supply for this region.”
Reservoir project brings concerns from ranchers
After the drought finally ended in 2017, the city applied for a water rights permit with the state to build the Lake Ringgold reservoir.
The reservoir would be formed by building a dam on the Little Wichita River approximately half a mile upstream from its confluence with the Red River and downstream from Lake Kickapoo and Lake Arrowhead.
The reservoir would cost $443 million to build and could hold 65,000 acre-feet of water per year. (An acre-foot of water is enough to cover one acre to a depth of one foot.)
The city would need 24,000 acres of land for the reservoir site, which includes the lake, pump station facilities and transmission line to send water to treatment facilities in Wichita Falls. The city owns approximately 6,662 acres of the land needed for the reservoir, but would still need to acquire the remaining land through purchase or eminent domain. Opponents of the project say it would force more than 25 Texas ranching families to sell all or part of the land.
On Monday, the Little Wichita River's current was aggressive. Much of Texas had experienced heavy rainfall the week prior, and the river's waters ran red with sediment, surrounded by green bushes and trees. Swallows, a common songbird in the area, glided from underneath a bridge to the trees and back.
Less than 5 miles away, Deborah Clark, a cattle rancher in Clay County, said a portion of her land would be seized through eminent domain if the project is approved. Clark has spent decades raising cattle through regenerative agriculture, a practice that draws visitors to her ranch from around Texas to witness the dance between her livestock and the land as her herd of about 5,000 steers moves from one side of her 12,000-acre ranch to the other.
Clark says letting the cattle roam — rather than letting them graze on a single parcel of land — prevents them from putting too much stress on one area and promotes better overall soil health and diversity.
“We use the entire ranch, not just a little piece,” she said.
In December, she spoke against the project during a seven-day contested case hearing before a state administrative judge in Austin, along with many other neighbors.
After the TCEQ issued a draft permit for Lake Ringgold in 2019, Clark and other local residents, along with environmental groups like the Texas Conservation Alliance, disputed that decision, which triggered the contested case hearing — a formal legal proceeding where parties present evidence and arguments regarding a specific environmental permit application.
At the hearing, they argued that Lake Ringgold would harm agriculture in the area and force landowners to sell the city their land.
After the hearing, the judge recommended that the TCEQ deny the city's request to build Lake Ringgold, saying the project was too big for what the city's shrinking population needed. While the city has projected a population increase to 120,000 by 2070, Wichita Falls' population has dropped from 104,000 to 102,000 since 2010, according to the latest U.S. Census.
Clay County rancher's land could be taken and flooded
About 15 minutes away from Clark's ranch, Shane Cody, 54, and his wife Casey, 51, stood in front of their country-style brick home with their dog Blue. It was a picturesque scene, the branches of two oak trees converging into an arc around them.
The couple has owned the 185 acres surrounding the house since 2005, but the land wasn't always this taken care of, according to Cody.
When they bought it to build their dream home — something Cody had promised his wife when they married six years before — the land was filled with mesquite trees, which are not great for cattle. Cody knew he had to remove them because the couple wanted to start a family cow/calf operation.
Cody bought an old bulldozer with a grubber and got to work. For two years, he spent evenings and weekends removing mesquite trees, brush, and roots. He also planted Bermuda grass.
“We put our blood, sweat and tears into this place,” Cody said.
Cody taught their three boys to take care of cattle and hunt deer on the property. During the pandemic, when the world was in lockdown, he even installed a zip line behind the house.
“This is where the boys grew up and learned to be men,” Cody said.
Cody said that now his work, livelihood and family memories tied to his home are at stake. In his office, he pulls out three manilla folders from a filing cabinet, takes out a map of the proposed Lake Ringgold and lays it out on his desk. If Lake Ringgold is built, it could come within feet of the back door of their home, inundating his backyard and, he fears, possibly cutting off their only way to escape the property during a flood.
Less than 20 minutes away, Brent Durham, 61, rode his four-wheeler through waist-high native tallgrass prairie. His property, which is approximately 5,000 acres, is blooming with red Indian blanket, yellow common sunflower and pink Indian paintbrush. Scissor-tailed flycatchers soared across the vast land.
One of the reasons Durham moved to rural Clay County 12 years ago was to experience the wildlife in the area. He raises livestock like cows and sheep on his property.
Part of the land has been in his family since the 1880s. Durham still has the old deeds. His mother spent part of her life on the land and so did his great-grandmother.
If Lake Ringgold is approved, approximately half of his property would be underwater.
“That's why the lake is so sad. This entire pasture would be gone,” Durham said. “I'm pretty sure [the city] could care less. They don't care, they're displacing all of us. ”
Durham has stage four colon cancer that has spread to his lung. He's been on and off chemotherapy since 2021. He said he doesn't have much longer to live, but he thinks of his teenage daughter who lives with him as well as his eldest son, who has a home on the property too.
“I'll be dead way before they construct the lake. But they want to stay here,” he said.
He said the lake would ruin his ability to make a living through grazing livestock.
Meanwhile, back in the city, Schreiber, the public works director, defended the proposed reservoir project.
“If I've got two glasses of water half full sitting on the table, I've got a certain amount of water to use, right?” he said. “If I've got three glasses of water half full, I've got more water to use, right?
“That's the reason reservoirs are built,” he added. “They're built to store floodwaters for use later. You dam up the river and you create an impoundment that stores that water for people to use at a later time.”
Disclosure: Arrow has been a financial supporter of The Texas Tribune, a nonprofit, nonpartisan news organization that is funded in part by donations from members, foundations and corporate sponsors. Financial supporters play no role in the Tribune's journalism. Find a complete list of them here.
We've got big things in store for you at The Texas Tribune Festival, happening Sept. 5–7 in downtown Austin. Join us for three days of big, bold conversations about politics, public policy and the day's news.
The post TCEQ to vote on Lake Ringgold reservoir near Wichita Falls appeared first on TexasTribune.org.
The Texas Tribune is a nonprofit, nonpartisan media organization that informs Texans — and engages with them — about public policy, politics, government and statewide issues.
-
The Center Square6 days ago
Cuellar says he’s innocent of public corruption charges | National
-
Texas News7 days ago
April Jobs Report Shows Employers Pulling Back on Hiring
-
Videos6 days ago
9 of 21 protesters arrested were not affiliated with UT Dallas, university says
-
Texas News6 days ago
Only one Kentucky Derby starting gate number has never seen a winner
-
Texas Tribune6 days ago
Flooded East Texas town begins cleanup
-
Texas Tribune6 days ago
Texas Senate District 15 special election happening Saturday
-
Texas Tribune7 days ago
Southeast Texas region expects more flooding Friday
-
Texas Tribune6 days ago
The Long Journey to Asylum for One Venezuelan Family.